Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Undisciplined: Aghast Confession

Linnaea Mallette, creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

This week on Undisciplined, we’re talking about the ways in which being innocent of a crime could make someone more likely to confess. And if that sounds like something that might only happen under really extreme circumstances, consider this: in nearly a third of the convictions that are later overturned by DNA evidence, the person who was convicted had at some point confessed to the crime.

Kyle Scherr is a professor of psychology at Central Michigan University. For the past decade, he’s been trying to solve the riddle of why people confess to things they haven’t done. His article on false confessions was recently published in the journal Perspectives on Psychological Science.

Scherr makes the case that confessions are sort of like a Rube Goldberg machine — one thing triggers another, which causes something else, which results in an outcome. And in a lot of cases — a tremendously disconcerting number of cases — the thing that sets everything into motion isn’t the guilt of the person who ultimately confesses. 

Matthew LaPlante has reported on ritual infanticide in Northern Africa, insurgent warfare in the Middle East, the legacy of genocide in Southeast Asia, and gang violence in Central America. But a few years back, something occurred to him: Maybe the news doesn't have to be so brutally depressing all the time. These days, he balances his continuing work on more heartbreaking subjects with his work on UnDisciplined — Utah Public Radio's weekly program on science and discovery.